It's reverse anamorphic then? It needs to be squeezed on playback, not unsqueezed?
Well I thought anamorphic just meant that it's encoded in a different aspect ratio than the one it's intended to be viewed in, I don't think that being anamorphic requires a particular ratio.
That is a compound number to save space, 1.33:1 is 4:3 internally -> 4 + (3 << 16) -> 196612
I suppose we could offer a way to enter custom ratios, it should support any ratio just fine.
Some way to support custom ratios, however it's implemented, would be great.
I wish I understood what you meant by a "compound number" though, as I don't understand what you wrote at all.
I don't know if it's just something that is advanced math, or something basic which I was never taught.
I remember my parents expressing that math had changed the most of any subject from what they were taught at the same age.