Hello!
C8: I am VERY sorry my English is poor for you to understand . English-English means translating English words into English( for example: explaining "thin" as skinny or slim instead of saying "THIN IS THIN").
The reason that I want to buy an English-English dictionary is that I already have several English-Chinese dictionaries (translate an English word into Chinese word). They don't have English explanations. Sometimes I think the Chinese explanation is not that accurate. So I would rather want to know the real English explanations. C8, I am sorry I have made you confused.
I already have the Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary (Translating English words into Chinese). But I still consider this dictionary to have few words. Maybe I should try The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (2 Vol. Set; Thumb Indexed Edition)
? No, it is too expensive - $100 and I don't want to carry 2 volumes wherever I go.
JimH: Thank you for your advice. I do think Webster is better. It has an online free dictionary
http://www.m-w.com The definitions there are rich. I am glad you would not mind finding Webster's Third for me, but I am afraid I can't afford the shipping cost since I bet that such a dictionary should be over 5 pounds.
But I have a good news for all of you. If you people want to keep a hugh dictionary in your computer, there comes the Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged CDROM (ISBN 0877794685
). I guess that's the CD version of the dictionary JimH is talking about. The CD version is $48.97 from Amazon.com. Hardcover $83.3.
Well, Webster does offer a $30 subscription for its unabridge dictionary online (yearly). Just a few minutes ago I signed up for its 7 day free trial. I tried the dictionary by typing "Hong Kong". Well the unabridged version tells me Hong Kong is a Brtitish Colony. Then I looked "Hong Kong" up in the free collegiate dictionary online. It can tell me that Hong Kong was former British colony and now a speical administrative region of China. Also, the unabridged can't show "soviet union", but the collegiate one can tell me that soviet union is "country 1922-91 E Europe & N Asia bordering on the Arctic & Pacific oceans & Baltic & Black seas; a union of 15 constituent republics capital Moscow area 8,649,512 square miles (22,402,236 square kilometers) "
Well, I am pretty sure that there are more new information in the Collegiate version than the unabridged version. But the unabrdiged one does offer more detailed explanations on verbs and adjectives. For example the collegiate dictionary only shows the meaning of "abandon" but the unabridged shows example sentences too like "abandoned the estates when he inherited them -- Charles Dickens". The UnA also shows more detailed history of words.
Interesting thing: collegiate can tell "roosevelt" as"Theodore 1858-1919 26th president of the U.S. (1901-09); acquired Canal Zone and began Panama Canal; awarded 1906 Nobel prize for peace for ending Russo-Japanese War " while the unabridged cannot tell.
However, I would not expect a dictionary to do all the things for me. If I want to know more about "roosevelt" , why dont I look it up on an encyclepedia (hard to spell)?
So, in conclusion, it's likely I pick the Webster's Third CD and probably an encyXXXX CD.