Thank you, this is helpful as I have forgotten.
However, it appears that support and development of APE, seems to have wained, while at the same time, FLAC, has been gaining more acceptance. Since there is no quality difference, I also liked APE for their front end, which included a nice APE player as well. But the big thing was the higher level of compression.
No complaints about FLAC, I am delighted that it appears that this open source product is becoming more and more accepted.
What I didn't understand was the 4k padding black,
the seek table and
the Ogg transport layer.
On the Ogg transport layer, that might be something I might think of using in the future.
I would need to see more about the growth of having
Ogg Vorbis for audio and Theora Ogg being embedded in W3 standardized web browser's like Firefox, that is supporting HTML 5 and their wonderful new
Video and Audio command.
I don't see any advantage to having FLAC in a Ogg package at the moment, but who knows, that might come in usewell at some time.
I am aware that the Quality field in the FLAC encoder front end, is about the level of compression and has virtually nothing to do with quality.
I guess it would be a good idea to have that changed to something like "Compression Level" instead.
I normally use 8, if I am not in any kind of rush. If I set it up and just walk away for a while, I might as well have the highest compression level set.
I am assuming that the higher the compression rate = slower encoding speed, it only a function of the e encoding, but not a function of playback. ?
I haven't heard APE referenced for a while. That used to be my lossless compressed format of choice. The biggest reason was that APE allows for smaller compressed files than FLAC. Okay, I thought the file extension name was kind of cool, especially since it was not a "techy" type of name. I liked the logo as well. MY COWON can decode and play both APE and FLAC, as can MC.
Thanks very much.,
Jon Temple