Topic: JRMark -- JRiver's Benchmark Tool (Read 239332 times)

JimH · « **Reply #100 on:** September 21, 2010, 06:37:23 am »

Power settings in Windows?

morrison · « **Reply #101 on:** September 21, 2010, 06:57:04 am »

Maybe memory settings, marko? or balanced power profile...

I'm also have strange result with new build and platform...

i5 760@4.2, offset voltage OC, C1E - ON, Turbo and C3-7 - OFF / 2x4GB DDR3@1520 (Stock samsung - possible weakest link?) / SSD r285/w275 / NV470 SLI

and:

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
   Single-threaded integer math... 3,173 seconds
   Single-threaded floating point math... 1,788 seconds
   Multi-threaded integer math... 1,648 seconds
   Multi-threaded mixed math... 0,943 seconds
Score: 2516

Running 'Image' benchmark...
   Image creation / destruction... 0,706 seconds
   Flood filling... 0,736 seconds
   Direct copying... 1,361 seconds
   Small renders... 2,006 seconds
   Bilinear rendering... 1,022 seconds
   Bicubic rendering... 0,943 seconds
Score: 3248

Running 'Database' benchmark...
   Create database... 0,412 seconds
   Populate database... 1,422 seconds
   Save database... 0,109 seconds
   Reload database... 0,031 seconds
   Search database... 1,160 seconds
   Sort database... 2,197 seconds
   Group database... 1,807 seconds
Score: 3012

JRMark (version 15.0.113): 2925

Can't undertand

.
Its new clean Win7x64 system, with excelent results in another benchmarks... But a comrade glynor reports of the great improvement!

So will tune more)

P.S. Power management off profile and no termal cpu throttling after few hours test by Linx ?

Alex B · « **Reply #102 on:** September 21, 2010, 07:04:43 am »

Quote from: marko on September 21, 2010, 02:17:07 am

Would you expect any of those three events to affect the benchmark tool quite so dramatically?

I have always seen lots of variation between individual tests when I do five or ten tests in a row. The difference can be as big as 20-30% and it also seems that sometimes one or two of the three parts in an individual test may be worse than before when one or two other parts are better.

When I have run the test I have always disabled all configurable background processes inside MC (auto-importer, servers, handheld, etc. - I don't know if MC would have disabled them automatically) and also some processes outside MC (virus scanner, blocked network access in the firewall, set my "ASUS EPU-4 Engine" automatic power saver to the constant "High performance" mode, etc) and the results are still surprisingly varied.

morrison · « **Reply #103 on:** September 21, 2010, 08:48:57 am »

New htpc with passive CPU heatsink (but with case fans, right

) :

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 3,334 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 1,883 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 0,723 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 0,551 seconds
Score: 2927

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 0,743 seconds
Flood filling... 0,429 seconds
Direct copying... 0,554 seconds
Small renders... 2,076 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 0,987 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 0,945 seconds
Score: 3838

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0,426 seconds
Populate database... 1,471 seconds
Save database... 0,112 seconds
Reload database... 0,030 seconds
Search database... 1,126 seconds
Sort database... 2,281 seconds
Group database... 1,812 seconds
Score: 2962

JRMark (version 15.0.113): 3242

Its i7 980@4Ghz DDR3 1600.. Will be interesting to test .115 build)

glynor · « **Reply #104 on:** September 21, 2010, 09:14:28 am »

A faulty PSU can impact processor performance if the CPU power supply voltage isn't stable, marko.

glynor · « **Reply #105 on:** September 21, 2010, 09:26:43 am »

Quote from: morrison on September 21, 2010, 08:48:57 am

JRMark (version 15.0.113): 3242

Its i7 980@4Ghz DDR3 1600.. Will be interesting to test .115 build)

That one will easily take my record when you get on .115+. Good show. The other one with the i5-760@4.2 should be better, based on a cursory exam of the specs. Are you sure it is stable? I had trouble with my i5-750 above 4GHz. It would boot Windows at 4.4GHz with only a little extra voltage, and it seemed pretty stable at 4.2-ish. I could run HyperPI and go through full runs of FutureMark, but one of the cores would fail multi-threaded Prime95 after 13-15 hours, so it wasn't quite there.

I'm sure I could have pushed more juice into it and got it stable, but I pushed it as high as I felt comfortable with for a 24/7 running server build (on air). At 4.0 with the dynamic clocking disabled, I was able to leave it at essentially stock voltage and it is bedrock-solid. So, that seemed like a good setup. I never like to push them up into the diminishing-returns voltage area. I've sent a few CPUs to early graves doing that over the long-term.

I doubt it is your memory holding it back here. I don't think MC is very memory bandwidth sensitive. But who knows. I can't remember what memory speed I have on my Core i5-750 (maybe I posted it earlier, I'll go look).

Ataylor · « **Reply #106 on:** September 21, 2010, 02:56:59 pm »

My times on an HP Workstation with an i9 quad core, 12 gigs of ram and 2 1.5 TB drives

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 4.553 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 2.567 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 1.371 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.923 seconds
Score: 2018

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 1.012 seconds
Flood filling... 0.672 seconds
Direct copying... 0.758 seconds
Small renders... 2.847 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 1.443 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 1.383 seconds
Score: 2711

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0.586 seconds
Populate database... 1.978 seconds
Save database... 0.163 seconds
Reload database... 0.042 seconds
Search database... 1.552 seconds
Sort database... 3.147 seconds
Group database... 2.407 seconds
Score: 2177

JRMark (version 15.0.113): 2302

JustinChase · « **Reply #107 on:** September 23, 2010, 05:35:18 pm »

I'm not cool enough to have ver .115 yet, but I've tested ver .113 several times and it always shows multi-threaded math as taking longer than single-threaded math.

Why is this? (my system stats are earlier in this thread)

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 5.748 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 3.603 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 6.467 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 4.075 seconds
Score: 955

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 2.321 seconds
Flood filling... 3.676 seconds
Direct copying... 3.071 seconds
Small renders... 4.515 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 4.124 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 4.747 seconds
Score: 980

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 1.051 seconds
Populate database... 3.656 seconds
Save database... 0.306 seconds
Reload database... 0.158 seconds
Search database... 3.961 seconds
Sort database... 6.190 seconds
Group database... 4.588 seconds
Score: 1080

JRMark (version 15.0.113): 1005

Matt · « **Reply #108 on:** September 23, 2010, 07:30:24 pm »

Quote from: JustinChase on September 23, 2010, 05:35:18 pm

it always shows multi-threaded math as taking longer than single-threaded math. Why is this?

It's a measure of how well your system does simple math with many threads at once.

It's doing more math in the multi-threaded tests than single-threaded tests, so you would probably need a quad core CPU to have a substantially lower multi-threaded time than single-threaded time.

JustinChase · « **Reply #109 on:** September 23, 2010, 08:08:50 pm »

thanks Matt. While looking at the other people scores, everyone else's multi-threaded scores are much lower. it just seems weird that mine are higher.

I don't expect much from this cheap computer, so it's not a complaint, I just figured something might be "out of wack".

glynor · « **Reply #110 on:** September 23, 2010, 11:54:40 pm »

Both of my two "main" machines are quad cores (a Q9550 in my HTPC and a Core i5 750 in my media server).

marko · « **Reply #111 on:** October 19, 2010, 02:47:05 am »

To cut a long story short, I have my PC back, and all appears to be good once more...

Quote

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 3.510 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 1.975 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 1.057 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.781 seconds
Score: 2595

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 0.785 seconds
Flood filling... 0.505 seconds
Direct copying... 0.550 seconds
Small renders... 2.131 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 1.148 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 1.069 seconds
Score: 3555

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0.370 seconds
Populate database... 1.286 seconds
Save database... 0.116 seconds
Reload database... 0.033 seconds
Search database... 1.194 seconds
Sort database... 0.910 seconds
Group database... 0.821 seconds
Score: 4546

JRMark (version 15.0.135): 3565

I'm happy again, but for how long, I wonder...

Matt · « **Reply #112 on:** January 18, 2011, 11:17:44 pm »

Here are some Sandy Bridge (2600K) benchmarks:
http://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php?topic=61559.0

pcstockton · « **Reply #113 on:** January 19, 2011, 12:44:07 am »

This was just run on my audio computer. I dont use it for much else other than the occasional Netflix stream or photo browsing/slideshow. 98% of its use is sending music to the Juli@.

Bog standard PC.
Pentium 4 - 2.80Ghz
Windows XP Home SP2
3GB RAM
Stock video card (I have a nice one but cant stand how loud its fan is)
Juli@ Sound Card
and its probably running a million things in the background or registry or whatever.

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 14.372 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 8.445 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 14.875 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 12.299 seconds
Score: 380

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 4.467 seconds
Flood filling... 1.878 seconds
Direct copying... 4.571 seconds
Small renders... 7.638 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 10.681 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 10.062 seconds
Score: 560

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 2.195 seconds
Populate database... 4.950 seconds
Save database... 0.446 seconds
Reload database... 0.175 seconds
Search database... 4.278 seconds
Sort database... 2.942 seconds
Group database... 3.476 seconds
Score: 1165

JRMark (version 15.0.142): 702

Should I take anything away from that? Seems to work fine in Theater Mode with 24/96 FLACs. That's all I care about.

Any suggestions?

Cheers!
Patrick

JimH · « **Reply #114 on:** April 17, 2011, 01:46:39 pm »

New machine:

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 3.616 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 2.402 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 1.207 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.799 seconds
Score: 2368

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 0.794 seconds
Flood filling... 0.428 seconds
Direct copying... 0.784 seconds
Small renders... 2.049 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 1.215 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 1.040 seconds
Score: 3487

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0.476 seconds
Populate database... 1.186 seconds
Save database... 0.127 seconds
Reload database... 0.052 seconds
Search database... 1.197 seconds
Sort database... 0.986 seconds
Group database... 0.890 seconds
Score: 4376

JRMark (version 16.0.68): 3410

kensn · « **Reply #115 on:** April 17, 2011, 02:30:06 pm »

Nice rig Jim..

Well I guess I am not too much of a clunker..... Don't have that fancy 16.0.68 version though....

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
   Single-threaded integer math... 3.946 seconds
   Single-threaded floating point math... 2.222 seconds
   Multi-threaded integer math... 1.354 seconds
   Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.893 seconds
Score: 2258

Running 'Image' benchmark...
   Image creation / destruction... 0.898 seconds
   Flood filling... 0.576 seconds
   Direct copying... 0.700 seconds
   Small renders... 2.432 seconds
   Bilinear rendering... 1.554 seconds
   Bicubic rendering... 1.363 seconds
Score: 2924

Running 'Database' benchmark...
   Create database... 0.540 seconds
   Populate database... 1.444 seconds
   Save database... 0.161 seconds
   Reload database... 0.071 seconds
   Search database... 1.527 seconds
   Sort database... 1.196 seconds
   Group database... 0.964 seconds
Score: 3642

JRMark (version 16.0.64): 2941

pleskinen · « **Reply #116 on:** June 06, 2011, 02:01:03 pm »

Core i7 920@3.8, WD Caviar Black, version 16.0.87:

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 3.520 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 1.985 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 1.073 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.682 seconds
Score: 2617

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 0.881 seconds
Flood filling... 0.493 seconds
Direct copying... 0.547 seconds
Small renders... 2.145 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 1.357 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 1.105 seconds
Score: 3371

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0.495 seconds
Populate database... 1.265 seconds
Save database... 0.119 seconds
Reload database... 0.053 seconds
Search database... 1.257 seconds
Sort database... 0.982 seconds
Group database... 0.752 seconds
Score: 4368

JRMark (version 16.0.87): 3452

Really liking JRiver Media Center.

tls62dk · « **Reply #117 on:** June 24, 2011, 11:28:42 am »

Core i7-2600, 3.4Ghz, 8Gb ram, Win 7 64bit

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 3,629 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 2,413 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 1,243 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 0,784 seconds
Score: 2355

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 0,778 seconds
Flood filling... 0,414 seconds
Direct copying... 0,703 seconds
Small renders... 2,040 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 1,141 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 1,027 seconds
Score: 3605

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0,444 seconds
Populate database... 1,149 seconds
Save database... 0,132 seconds
Reload database... 0,063 seconds
Search database... 1,174 seconds
Sort database... 0,996 seconds
Group database... 0,850 seconds
Score: 4472

JRMark (version 16.0.116): 3477

kamimeguro · « **Reply #118 on:** June 26, 2011, 07:58:39 am »

Core i7 920@2.6, 6 Gig memory, version 16.0.119: Win 7/64 Home Premium

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 4.810 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 2.729 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 1.340 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.939 seconds
Score: 1935

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 1.118 seconds
Flood filling... 0.719 seconds
Direct copying... 0.717 seconds
Small renders... 2.881 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 1.627 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 1.408 seconds
Score: 2597

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0.620 seconds
Populate database... 2.053 seconds
Save database... 0.361 seconds
Reload database... 0.076 seconds
Search database... 1.709 seconds
Sort database... 1.542 seconds
Group database... 1.051 seconds
Score: 2900

JRMark (version 16.0.119): 2478

Cheers
Kami

tls62dk · « **Reply #119 on:** June 26, 2011, 10:16:11 am »

Core i5-M560 2.67Ghz 4Gb ram. Asrock Vision 3D

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 4,206 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 2,364 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 2,371 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 1,713 seconds
Score: 1783

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 0,944 seconds
Flood filling... 1,144 seconds
Direct copying... 1,187 seconds
Small renders... 2,585 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 2,390 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 2,138 seconds
Score: 2118

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0,652 seconds
Populate database... 1,922 seconds
Save database... 0,379 seconds
Reload database... 0,087 seconds
Search database... 1,762 seconds
Sort database... 1,353 seconds
Group database... 0,971 seconds
Score: 3017

JRMark (version 16.0.119): 2306

TLS

666JackTheKnife666 · « **Reply #120 on:** June 26, 2011, 01:20:50 pm »

This is my laptop server computer core 2 quad 2ghz

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 5.603 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 3.314 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 3.128 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 1.820 seconds
Score: 1370

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 2.184 seconds
Flood filling... 1.356 seconds
Direct copying... 2.288 seconds
Small renders... 3.880 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 2.340 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 2.140 seconds
Score: 1551

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 1.057 seconds
Populate database... 2.755 seconds
Save database... 0.266 seconds
Reload database... 0.242 seconds
Search database... 2.774 seconds
Sort database... 2.237 seconds
Group database... 1.784 seconds
Score: 1934

JRMark (version 16.0.119): 1618

I could not resist joining the thread for grins and giggles.

Trumpetguy · « **Reply #121 on:** June 26, 2011, 03:44:21 pm »

You should not worry about grins and giggles.
AMD Phenom X3 2.4 GHz with 8GB ram and nVidia 560 Ti video. Wonder if upgrading to the new Phenom II X6 (6 cores) will drive my score above 2000? Or 3000?
Or are there other things that could be tweaked?

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 11.027 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 5.823 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 7.583 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 3.965 seconds
Score: 669

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 1.566 seconds
Flood filling... 1.504 seconds
Direct copying... 1.804 seconds
Small renders... 5.672 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 3.705 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 3.078 seconds
Score: 1270

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0.790 seconds
Populate database... 3.049 seconds
Save database... 0.526 seconds
Reload database... 0.099 seconds
Search database... 3.041 seconds
Sort database... 2.356 seconds
Group database... 1.651 seconds
Score: 1868

JRMark (version 16.0.119): 1269

mark_h · « **Reply #122 on:** June 27, 2011, 01:52:23 am »

New PC.

Intel i5-2500K @ 3.30Ghz, 8Gb ram, Win 7 64-bit

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 3.658 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 2.436 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 1.861 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 1.244 seconds
Score: 2065

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 0.874 seconds
Flood filling... 0.382 seconds
Direct copying... 0.611 seconds
Small renders... 2.084 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 1.079 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 0.991 seconds
Score: 3654

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0.455 seconds
Populate database... 1.157 seconds
Save database... 0.116 seconds
Reload database... 0.052 seconds
Search database... 1.199 seconds
Sort database... 0.955 seconds
Group database... 0.771 seconds
Score: 4569

JRMark (version 16.0.119): 3430

JimH · « **Reply #123 on:** June 28, 2011, 12:37:14 pm »

My i7, standard clock, SSD.

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
   Single-threaded integer math... 3.600 seconds
   Single-threaded floating point math... 2.396 seconds
   Multi-threaded integer math... 1.233 seconds
   Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.841 seconds
Score: 2355

Running 'Image' benchmark...
   Image creation / destruction... 0.804 seconds
   Flood filling... 0.406 seconds
   Direct copying... 0.743 seconds
   Small renders... 2.033 seconds
   Bilinear rendering... 1.135 seconds
   Bicubic rendering... 1.053 seconds
Score: 3564

Running 'Database' benchmark...
   Create database... 0.451 seconds
   Populate database... 1.119 seconds
   Save database... 0.121 seconds
   Reload database... 0.052 seconds
   Search database... 1.197 seconds
   Sort database... 0.944 seconds
   Group database... 0.807 seconds
Score: 4583

JRMark (version 16.0.121): 3501

JimH · « **Reply #124 on:** June 28, 2011, 12:39:32 pm »

Matt's machine:

Sandy Bridge 2600K @ 4.8:
=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 2.838 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 1.876 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 0.901 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.699 seconds
Score: 3009

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 0.608 seconds
Flood filling... 0.547 seconds
Direct copying... 1.113 seconds
Small renders... 1.592 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 0.834 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 0.751 seconds
Score: 4040

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0.347 seconds
Populate database... 0.931 seconds
Save database... 0.090 seconds
Reload database... 0.025 seconds
Search database... 0.789 seconds
Sort database... 0.718 seconds
Group database... 0.637 seconds
Score: 6080

JRMark (version xx.x.xx): 4376

glynor · « **Reply #125 on:** June 28, 2011, 12:45:29 pm »

Wow! He hit 4.8? On air or is that liquid cooled?

jmone · « **Reply #126 on:** August 01, 2011, 05:41:17 am »

My new HTPC- i7-2600K, SSD in a little Shuttle SH67H7...now what GPU to use!

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 3.996 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 2.656 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 1.248 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.860 seconds
Score: 2169

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 0.860 seconds
Flood filling... 0.428 seconds
Direct copying... 0.698 seconds
Small renders... 2.269 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 1.189 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 1.086 seconds
Score: 3369

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0.483 seconds
Populate database... 1.223 seconds
Save database... 0.160 seconds
Reload database... 0.087 seconds
Search database... 1.249 seconds
Sort database... 1.026 seconds
Group database... 0.931 seconds
Score: 4167

JRMark (version 16.0.143): 3235

psam · « **Reply #127 on:** November 13, 2011, 11:20:57 pm »

Here goes, my almost 5 years old, Quadcore E6600 @2.4Ghz! Its a new graphics card though, one year old 6850.
-----------------------------------------------
=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 7,004 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 4,390 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 3,626 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 2,331 seconds
Score: 1095

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 2,637 seconds
Flood filling... 1,661 seconds
Direct copying... 2,282 seconds
Small renders... 5,558 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 3,047 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 2,733 seconds
Score: 1228

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 1,382 seconds
Populate database... 4,186 seconds
Save database... 1,183 seconds
Reload database... 0,300 seconds
Search database... 3,054 seconds
Sort database... 2,697 seconds
Group database... 1,545 seconds
Score: 1499

JRMark (version 17.0.33): 1274

psam · « **Reply #128 on:** December 30, 2011, 04:56:12 am »

...And my brand new HTPC, an Asrock 3D Vision 252B mini PC:
=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 4,405 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 2,922 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 2,480 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 1,794 seconds
Score: 1638

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 0,945 seconds
Flood filling... 0,464 seconds
Direct copying... 0,750 seconds
Small renders... 2,499 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 2,200 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 2,065 seconds
Score: 2465

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0,572 seconds
Populate database... 1,529 seconds
Save database... 0,213 seconds
Reload database... 0,050 seconds
Search database... 1,330 seconds
Sort database... 1,187 seconds
Group database... 0,751 seconds
Score: 3817

JRMark (version 17.0.60): 2640

machinehead · « **Reply #129 on:** January 09, 2012, 06:14:00 pm »

Not sure yet if this will cut the mustard with RedOctober, but will give it a try,
originally built as a music only server, but since it came with an HDMI out,
I thought I would give streaming video a try.

Mini ITX AMD:

AMD G-Series T56N Dual Core 1.6GHz APU
8 GB DDR3
OCZ SSD

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 17.655 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 7.916 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 17.738 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 8.631 seconds
Score: 366

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 3.435 seconds
Flood filling... 3.496 seconds
Direct copying... 2.881 seconds
Small renders... 11.325 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 10.166 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 8.807 seconds
Score: 548

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 1.943 seconds
Populate database... 4.774 seconds
Save database... 0.665 seconds
Reload database... 0.189 seconds
Search database... 4.834 seconds
Sort database... 3.800 seconds
Group database... 2.157 seconds
Score: 1171

JRMark (version 17.0.59): 695

jesseinsf · « **Reply #130 on:** March 30, 2012, 11:19:48 pm »

My Corei7 930 @2.8Ghz is:

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 4.529 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 2.557 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 1.367 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.902 seconds
Score: 2031

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 0.976 seconds
Flood filling... 0.524 seconds
Direct copying... 0.502 seconds
Small renders... 1.741 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 1.213 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 1.066 seconds
Score: 3654

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0.586 seconds
Populate database... 1.721 seconds
Save database... 0.199 seconds
Reload database... 0.040 seconds
Search database... 1.394 seconds
Sort database... 1.210 seconds
Group database... 0.900 seconds
Score: 3555

JRMark (version 17.0.117): 3080

Trumpetguy · « **Reply #131 on:** April 04, 2012, 11:27:47 am »

New computer

Intel Core i7-2600 3.4GHz
Geforce GTX 560Ti
Samsung 830 SSD
ASUS P8Z68
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600MHz 16GB CL9

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 3,239 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 2,151 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 1,019 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 0,681 seconds
Score: 2680

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 0,676 seconds
Flood filling... 0,343 seconds
Direct copying... 0,586 seconds
Small renders... 1,090 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 0,803 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 0,677 seconds
Score: 5269

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0,478 seconds
Populate database... 1,513 seconds
Save database... 0,310 seconds
Reload database... 0,047 seconds
Search database... 0,965 seconds
Sort database... 0,970 seconds
Group database... 0,636 seconds
Score: 4371

JRMark (version 17.0.117): 4107

pcstockton · « **Reply #132 on:** April 12, 2012, 01:15:54 pm »

New Computer!!! Woohoo! MC performance is much improved as the new benchmark shows. My previous was like 700.

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 4.315 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 2.858 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 2.434 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 1.735 seconds
Score: 1675

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 0.896 seconds
Flood filling... 0.469 seconds
Direct copying... 0.783 seconds
Small renders... 1.449 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 1.669 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 1.569 seconds
Score: 3219

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0.537 seconds
Populate database... 1.511 seconds
Save database... 0.406 seconds
Reload database... 0.063 seconds
Search database... 1.319 seconds
Sort database... 1.181 seconds
Group database... 0.963 seconds
Score: 3595

JRMark (version 17.0.122): 2830

ASRock COREHT 252B
Intel Sandy Bridge
i5-2520M - 2.5ghz
4gb RAM
Windows 7 - 64bit

ths61 · « **Reply #133 on:** April 16, 2012, 09:34:46 pm »

Aging Intel Core i7 980X on Asus Sabertooth X58 (Socket LGA 1366 - 1st Generation Sandy Bridge)
Win7 64-bit

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
   Single-threaded integer math... 3.629 seconds
   Single-threaded floating point math... 2.048 seconds
   Multi-threaded integer math... 0.807 seconds
   Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.517 seconds
Score: 2714

Running 'Image' benchmark...
   Image creation / destruction... 0.803 seconds
   Flood filling... 0.721 seconds
   Direct copying... 0.540 seconds
   Small renders... 1.401 seconds
   Bilinear rendering... 0.964 seconds
   Bicubic rendering... 0.830 seconds
Score: 4184

Running 'Database' benchmark...
   Create database... 0.464 seconds
   Populate database... 1.715 seconds
   Save database... 0.287 seconds
   Reload database... 0.038 seconds
   Search database... 1.143 seconds
   Sort database... 1.075 seconds
   Group database... 0.778 seconds
Score: 3909

JRMark (version 17.0.122): 3602

Daydream · « **Reply #134 on:** April 17, 2012, 02:51:40 am »

Intel Core i5-2500K @ 4.9, 8GB RAM XMP1600, SSD, Asus MB, just playing with Asus tools for tuning.

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 2.735 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 1.824 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 1.409 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.990 seconds
Score: 2731

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 0.650 seconds
Flood filling... 0.304 seconds
Direct copying... 0.584 seconds
Small renders... 0.914 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 0.645 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 0.546 seconds
Score: 6039

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0.341 seconds
Populate database... 0.893 seconds
Save database... 0.098 seconds
Reload database... 0.024 seconds
Search database... 0.807 seconds
Sort database... 0.709 seconds
Group database... 0.635 seconds
Score: 6132

JRMark (version 17.0.125): 4967

petrossa · « **Reply #135 on:** April 17, 2012, 05:35:21 am »

Bunch of Intel fanbois

Phenom II x6 1100T standard clock.

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 7,755 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 4,068 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 2,958 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 1,521 seconds
Score: 1166

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 1,085 seconds
Flood filling... 1,233 seconds
Direct copying... 1,256 seconds
Small renders... 4,008 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 2,160 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 1,696 seconds
Score: 1923

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0,553 seconds
Populate database... 2,423 seconds
Save database... 1,327 seconds
Reload database... 0,436 seconds
Search database... 1,974 seconds
Sort database... 1,463 seconds
Group database... 1,048 seconds
Score: 2331

JRMark (version 17.0.125): 1806

JimH · « **Reply #136 on:** April 17, 2012, 06:41:07 am »

Quote from: Daydream on April 17, 2012, 02:51:40 am

JRMark (version 17.0.125): 4967

That may be a new record.

wig · « **Reply #137 on:** April 19, 2012, 11:45:07 am »

Here's my new HP Touchsmart 610-1250x, i7-2600 @ 3.4GHz 8GB Ram

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 3.855 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 2.567 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 1.226 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.836 seconds
Score: 2240

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 0.871 seconds
Flood filling... 0.425 seconds
Direct copying... 0.706 seconds
Small renders... 1.338 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 1.219 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 1.102 seconds
Score: 3885

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0.397 seconds
Populate database... 1.279 seconds
Save database... 0.149 seconds
Reload database... 0.036 seconds
Search database... 1.183 seconds
Sort database... 0.971 seconds
Group database... 0.726 seconds
Score: 4533

JRMark (version 17.0.130): 3553

MrC · « **Reply #138 on:** April 19, 2012, 12:19:36 pm »

Quote from: JimH on April 17, 2012, 06:41:07 am

That may be a new record.

Ah, but did you see the pictures of Daydream's scorched desk?

Daydream · « **Reply #139 on:** April 20, 2012, 12:17:18 am »

Temps were fine (72-75C; Tj Max for this CPU is 98C), the voltage was the problem. I got a couple of warnings (exceeding 1.5V if I remember correctly), but the system remained stable while I run the benchmark 5 times. The darn Asus tool seemed to know no limits, it offered to raise the freq. another 100 or so MHz but I stopped it. I would have topped 5GHz and a 5000 score. On this normal mATX board not a Maximus IV Gene-Z stuff.
But I'm no pro overclocker, some of this is probably a lucky combination of components.

InflatableMouse · « **Reply #140 on:** April 25, 2012, 02:24:32 pm »

What do I win?

I'm trying to push it over the 5000 mark.

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
   Single-threaded integer math... 2.702 seconds
   Single-threaded floating point math... 1.801 seconds
   Multi-threaded integer math... 0.878 seconds
   Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.559 seconds
Score: 3199

Running 'Image' benchmark...
   Image creation / destruction... 0.580 seconds
   Flood filling... 0.296 seconds
   Direct copying... 0.587 seconds
   Small renders... 0.905 seconds
   Bilinear rendering... 0.650 seconds
   Bicubic rendering... 0.553 seconds
Score: 6161

Running 'Database' benchmark...
   Create database... 0.288 seconds
   Populate database... 1.112 seconds
   Save database... 0.235 seconds
   Reload database... 0.034 seconds
   Search database... 0.774 seconds
   Sort database... 0.795 seconds
   Group database... 0.598 seconds
Score: 5604

JRMark (version 17.0.133): 4988

JimH · « **Reply #141 on:** April 25, 2012, 02:31:50 pm »

We'll send you a t-shirt signed by the team if you get it over 5000.

InflatableMouse · « **Reply #142 on:** April 25, 2012, 02:40:25 pm »

Quote from: JimH on April 25, 2012, 02:31:50 pm

We'll send you a t-shirt signed by the team if you get it over 5000.

Haha I hope I don't make you regret saying that 'cos here it is

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
   Single-threaded integer math... 2.603 seconds
   Single-threaded floating point math... 1.734 seconds
   Multi-threaded integer math... 0.802 seconds
   Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.541 seconds
Score: 3345

Running 'Image' benchmark...
   Image creation / destruction... 0.578 seconds
   Flood filling... 0.288 seconds
   Direct copying... 0.587 seconds
   Small renders... 0.869 seconds
   Bilinear rendering... 0.625 seconds
   Bicubic rendering... 0.528 seconds
Score: 6331

Running 'Database' benchmark...
   Create database... 0.279 seconds
   Populate database... 1.064 seconds
   Save database... 0.246 seconds
   Reload database... 0.035 seconds
   Search database... 0.753 seconds
   Sort database... 0.769 seconds
   Group database... 0.499 seconds
Score: 5899

JRMark (version 17.0.133): 5192

Including screenshot in my own skin!

i7 2600k @ 5.2GHz / 1.55v - and it's aircooled

MrC · « **Reply #143 on:** April 25, 2012, 02:45:24 pm »

Smokin' !

Is this like walking across coals for 2 seconds?

InflatableMouse · « **Reply #144 on:** April 25, 2012, 02:50:12 pm »

Quote from: MrC on April 25, 2012, 02:45:24 pm

Smokin' !

Is this like walking across coals for 2 seconds?

It ain't smokin', that wouldn't be good

It's actually oke, the fans don't even spin up high enough for me to hear them during the benchmark tests

See the attached screenie, core temps stayed well below 80 degrees.

JimH · « **Reply #145 on:** April 25, 2012, 02:53:35 pm »

OK, Nice Work!

We need a size and address. You can mail it to me. I'm jimh at jriver.

Which chip do you have?

InflatableMouse · « **Reply #146 on:** April 25, 2012, 03:06:39 pm »

Its an i7 2600k running at 5.2GHz for that occasion.

JimH · « **Reply #147 on:** April 25, 2012, 03:17:32 pm »

Here are the shirts. Do you want white (first) or beige?

http://pix01.com/Vx%40bfuv

Do you want the signatures or just plain? We could sign around the bottom so it would only be visible to your closest friends.

Daydream · « **Reply #148 on:** April 25, 2012, 04:03:07 pm »

So, what do we get for a 6000 score and what is considered fair game to get there?

rick.ca · « **Reply #149 on:** April 25, 2012, 07:15:44 pm »

Quote from: JimH on April 25, 2012, 03:17:32 pm

Here are the shirts.

I still think it's a cat.

Quote from: Daydream on April 25, 2012, 04:03:07 pm

So, what do we get for a 6000 score...

A fire extinguisher.

INTERACT FORUM

Author Topic: JRMark -- JRiver's Benchmark Tool (Read 239332 times)