This was asked in another thread here, and I in others I've seen, and I don't know the answer, and haven't seen any great answers anywhere else, so I thought I'd ask it here.
has anyone narrowed down the "minimum" hardware requirements to use HQ (madVR)?
a fast GPU is necessary, but what is 'just' fast enough?
I believe it's shader cores that do all the work, and I know all types of videos will have varying demands, but I'm considering building a new system, and don't want to overbuy the video card, to save some energy, but mostly I'm just curious.
Has anyone compiled feedback, or otherwise knows the point where an ATI or nVidia card becomes "faster"?
Also, assuming an ATI card, we need to do software decoding using LAV, what would be considered the 'minimum' needed to have trouble-free video playback on most all content?
I'm guessing there isn't a definitive consensus (or I would like to think I'd have seen it by now), so maybe people could post feedback on what hardware they have, and whether or not it can handle Red October HQ.
I think a standard "difficult" file would be a good test; to compare apples to apples. I can't remember, but it seems 1080i might be the most "demanding" but I could certainly have remembered that wrong. I find Avatar scenes of heavy CGI moving fast in the trees causes issues for my system; sometimes.
I'm sure there is a better test file/scene, but I think many would be interested to know the answer to this.
Maybe not