Love JRiver, but at some of these other sites {CA},why are they charging insane prices for hardware,I play music,read it ,write it,for a living so why does it cost more to listen to it than it is to make it,just curious
This is a question I have learned to avoid responding too. Too much of an emotional response from people. I also play and write music and used to do it professionally. One day a friend that I had lost contact with for 40 years and use to play in a band with (and since a professional studio musician), came over to my house. I proudly showed him what was at the time my pretty slick "audiophile system". He asked me to play some music by an artist, and I replied "ahhh nan, that would sound like crap, I only have that on mp3s" .... and he asked me incredulously, "you listen to the music or do you listen to your equipment?". That was a wake-up call for me!
it's a hobby, and every hobby has enthusiasts, and enthusiast level gear
Well put! But I like to flyfish so I like fancy reels that cost a fortune ... does fancy gear make me catch more fish? a better rod might help me cast further, so present my fly to more fish I guess. Does having an expensive pre-war Martin guitar make me a better guitar player? It probably (might would be the better choice
) would sound better, but a better player?? haha I wish.
All hobbies have goals. If the goal is to listen music or tinker with electronics, both are cool. A little bit of honesty would be refreshing though -- meaning that those whose "hobby" goals are to listen to music or those that want to build sound systems should be separated. They can be combined of course, but unfortunately they not always are. I admit though that playing on a nice piano motivates me to play more, so listening to a top-end sound system might help some people listen more ?
Once a certain level of "investment" is spent/achieved on an audio system, I think its more that it can sound different, rather than better (if there are
actually audible differences that is). As an example for guitar players out there ... is a basic Gibson J-45 compared to a very expensive "boutique" guitar going to sound worse ... not in my opinion .. it will sound different, the rest is subjective. Of course I'm not talking about 200$ guitar that goes out of tune in 2 seconds
However, if it makes you enjoy things more and you have the money, ok why not level your gear. The adding of "phile" at the end cracks me up a bit though ... do words like fishaphile, instrumentaphile or boataphile exist??
Again avoiding the OP's question directly, I believe that in the digital domain, where you best spend money is different than a totally analogue system. I agree with Jmone list, maybe if i ordered it I would put the DAC above the amp. For analogue, the source components are important and good turntables cost. Some things that are sold I find ridiculous to purchase and are based on confirmation/expectation biases. Companies take advantage of these biases and scientific grey areas. But that would bring up heated arguments that go nowhere, so I'll contain myself for a change !
Unless I had a tremendous amount of disposable income, if I spend more on equipment, over say a 3 to 5 year period, than I do on music and going to concerts supporting the artists, then something is not right for me. I tend to lose patience with people that insist they are music lovers who spend 25K on their systems, have only 200 cds and never give back to the artists seeing them live. But I guess that's my problem not theirs
It all about enhancing the enjoyment.