Wow, you hit two different Cultural Myths in one sentence !
I try hard
I like the flat earth society analogy as it conjures up scenes of people making measurements to justify just about anything. On the other hand we can also convince ourselves about just about anything if we want to believe it.Hey a good rationalization beats the truth anytime
Oh, the flat earth society are apparently alive and well judging from this quote from the flatearthsociety.org....."Much of the experimental evidence for a flat earth is provided by Dr. Samuel Birley Rowbotham, a 19th century lecturer who traveled the isles of Britain giving lectures at many prominent universities of the day. His experimental evidence is very easily reproducible and requires only access to a long body of standing water and a little trig to conclude that water is not convex, that the surface of the earth does not curve as round earth doctrine mathematically predicts. Other experiments require only a stick and a plumb line. Each of the experiments are described in full in the flat earth literature. "
You know they must be right because they have data, and data is evidence.
If you first put your speakers on big soft pillows, and then later put them on marble pillars, you will notice an obvious difference in bass response.
I agree but can you measure it? Maybe someone has, I dont know. More the point what surrogate data are they relying on.
However, it is illogical to say that "because someone is selling a poorly made stand for $1000, therefore there is no difference between any sort of speaker mounting methods".
I wonder if engineers use speaker stands? So long as you enjoy the music ...can you measure enjoyment?, just kidding, its all in good fun
As you said, snake oil may (or may not) be good for you but just the same I think I'll take my oega -3 's through eating fish
Is Krill oil better than fish oil I hear you ask. There is a body of evidence to suggest it is more efficacious but none of the outcome studies (meaning coronary events or toal mortality) have substantiated this..yet, maybe never.So why is it exactly more "efficacious"....alegedly manipulating a surrogate measurement like lipid profile? Dont get me wrong I take my statin every day and have a wonderfully low LDL :-)
Over 30 years ago when a medical student, a professor lectured us about the benefits of high polyunsaturated oils in our diet.The next year he came in and said that was 'out', it in fact causes increase in some cancers (true story). I have been skeptical about "data" and evidence ever since.They are still debating the relative merits of balancong Omega-3 with omega-6 in our diets….hey, and don't get me started on cholesterol.
As a renowned professor of Medicine recently said to me "I love evidence based medicine, if only we had the evidence". What he perhaps should of said is "quality evidence". It is in the interpretation of this evidence is where the water starts to get murky.....and that's where we go full circle, that's subjective !