INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Is a conversion from SACD .iso to flac at 24/176 lossy?  (Read 10476 times)

psam

  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 153
Is a conversion from SACD .iso to flac at 24/176 lossy?
« on: August 23, 2013, 12:40:40 pm »

I am thinking of converting all my SACD .iso files to flac tracks at 24/176 so that I can manipulate the individual tracks with more flexibility from within MC, such as creating playlists that are burned to audio CDs or transferred to portable devices in mp3 format and so on.

Media Center does not provide such conversions at all so I am using foobar.

Foobar can convert to 176 or 384 samplerates. My current DAC goes up to 192 kHz PCM, no DSD.

With 2 channel stereo, will there be a loss of audible data when I play the flac files on Media Center instead of the SACD?
Logged

InflatableMouse

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3978
Re: Is a conversion from SACD .iso to flac at 24/176 lossy?
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2013, 01:30:31 pm »

Why don't you use sacd_extract to convert to individual dff tracks?
Logged

psam

  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 153
Re: Is a conversion from SACD .iso to flac at 24/176 lossy?
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2013, 09:47:55 am »

Why don't you use sacd_extract to convert to individual dff tracks?
I haven't heard about it. Is this another software program? Off to Google!
Thanx!

PS, and what do I do with these dff tracks?
Logged

InflatableMouse

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3978
Re: Is a conversion from SACD .iso to flac at 24/176 lossy?
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2013, 10:29:09 am »

These are the individual tracks extracted from the iso. Like with a regular audio cd, the wav files are the tracks on the audio cd iso.

Logged

astromo

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 2251
Re: Is a conversion from SACD .iso to flac at 24/176 lossy?
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2013, 08:49:07 pm »

A thought I had was that you could potentially use a tool like this to check:
http://losslessaudiochecker.com/
Not sure how good / bad this is. I note a particular lack of write up explaining the theory realised by the software.

There are probably other options out there if you can't rely on your ears. Let us know what you find.
Logged
MC33, Win10 x64, HD-Plex H5 Gen2 Case, HD-Plex 400W Hi-Fi DC-ATX / AC-DC PSU, Gigabyte Z370 ULTRA Gaming 2.0 MoBo, Intel Core i7 8700 CPU, 4x8GB GSkill DDR4 RAM, Schiit Modi Multibit DAC, Freya Pre, Nelson Pass Aleph J DIY Clone, Ascension Timberwolf 8893BSRTL Speakers, BJC 5T00UP cables, DVB-T Tuner HDHR5-4DT

kstuart

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1955
  • Upgraded to MC22 Master using preorder discount
Re: Is a conversion from SACD .iso to flac at 24/176 lossy?
« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2013, 09:18:11 pm »

Any conversion from SACD to FLAC is lossey, because you are losing the super high frequency rate and single-bit encoding of the original.  They are two different systems.  That is a different situation from when you convert FLAC to APE - in that case, both are lossless PCM systems, so the conversion is lossless.

Whether the converted files sound audibly different from the original is a different issue, which is generally felt to be off-topic here.  ;D

InflatableMouse

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3978
Re: Is a conversion from SACD .iso to flac at 24/176 lossy?
« Reply #6 on: August 26, 2013, 01:53:00 am »

A thought I had was that you could potentially use a tool like this to check:
http://losslessaudiochecker.com/
Not sure how good / bad this is. I note a particular lack of write up explaining the theory realised by the software.

There are probably other options out there if you can't rely on your ears. Let us know what you find.

That isn't going to work. I'm pretty sure it's designed to detect mp3 or similar lossy compression which were then converted to wav/flac/ape/etc. Going from dsd to flac will lose ultrasound as kstuart already said but I don't think that tool will consider that "a loss" as its far above what humans can hear.
Logged

Henglander

  • Recent member
  • *
  • Posts: 47
Re: Is a conversion from SACD .iso to flac at 24/176 lossy?
« Reply #7 on: August 26, 2013, 09:57:08 am »

Going from dsd to flac will lose ultrasound as kstuart already said but I don't think that tool will consider that "a loss" as its far above what humans can hear.

Err... do you mean noise? Isn't the problem with DSD that the noise increases as the frequency increases, which is why one needs to apply a low pass filter to stop the tweeter from frying?
Logged

InflatableMouse

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3978
Re: Is a conversion from SACD .iso to flac at 24/176 lossy?
« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2013, 10:21:43 am »

Correct. JRiver applies a low pass filter @ 30 kHz for DSD playback.

I thought ultrasound sounded way cooler though ;).
Logged

JimH

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 72407
  • Where did I put my teeth?
Re: Is a conversion from SACD .iso to flac at 24/176 lossy?
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2013, 10:30:20 am »

I thought ultrasound sounded way cooler though ;).

Logged

bulldogger

  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 191
Re: Is a conversion from SACD .iso to flac at 24/176 lossy?
« Reply #10 on: August 31, 2013, 08:36:09 am »

Oh yeah. Us dogs like good music!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up