Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[jtwrace]

I've been very curious to know if the new Mac Pro would yield any result with JRiver MC.  So I went to the Mac store and downloaded MC onto the pro and ran the Benchmark Tool.  Here is the not so special result.

Mac Pro 6-Core 16GB RAM $4,000  

[jtwrace]

Here are the actual unit specs:

[JohnT]

A JRMark of 3800 is not too shabby though, it beats all other Mac JRMarks on this thread:
http://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php?topic=83470.0

[jtwrace]

A JRMark of 3800 is not too shabby though compared to all other Mac JRMarks on this thread:
http://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php?topic=83470.0

No but this is a $4k Mac.  If you compare this to the Mac Mini 2.6 QC it's nearly the same result for a quarter of the price.  

Of course this is using JRiver.  Obviously there will be programs that will require the Mac Pro.  I'm only interested in JRiver though.  

[azteca x]

Well my Hackintosh got this  It was maybe ~1300, and that's because I needed a fancy graphics card for video editing work.  Running 10.9.1

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
    Single-threaded integer math... 3.915 seconds
    Single-threaded floating point math... 2.396 seconds
    Multi-threaded integer math... 1.046 seconds
    Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.653 seconds
Score: 2372

Running 'Image' benchmark...
    Image creation / destruction... 1.012 seconds
    Flood filling... 0.596 seconds
    Direct copying... 1.264 seconds
    Small renders... 1.165 seconds
    Bilinear rendering... 1.144 seconds
    Bicubic rendering... 0.543 seconds
Score: 3844

Running 'Database' benchmark...
    Create database... 0.327 seconds
    Populate database... 1.371 seconds
    Save database... 0.142 seconds
    Reload database... 0.057 seconds
    Search database... 1.010 seconds
    Sort database... 0.652 seconds
    Group database... 0.727 seconds
Score: 5015

JRMark (version 19.0.100): 3744

[JohnAV]

I was looking at this benchmark with a 2012 2.6 Ghz rMBP, but found the first results are the fastest, and then it seems to provide uneven results with sequential benchmarks, not consistent IMHO.

[JimH]

It's normal for the benchmarks to vary a little (10%?), but make sure you're not running something in the background.

[glynor]

I did a JRMark on one.  It's in the JRMark thread, near the end:

http://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php?topic=54396.msg597176#msg597176