INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: just starting out: rip to WAV and/or AIFF?  (Read 4504 times)

burchmere21

  • Recent member
  • *
  • Posts: 9
just starting out: rip to WAV and/or AIFF?
« on: January 23, 2015, 06:46:40 pm »

Just starting to go digital.  Not a hardcore audiophile but certainly appreciate good sound and know it doesn't come from an mp3.  I've started out trialing both dbPowerAmp and JRiver.  I've scanned the forums but am still a bit unclear on the WAV vs AIFF question.  I'd kind of prefer not to keep two copies of all my digitized CDs (as suggested here http://www.computeraudiophile.com/content/309-computer-audiophile-cd-ripping-strategy-and-methodology/).  Thought WAV was the way to go but it seems as though folks say the tag/metadata support is not so good, and AIFF is better in that regard.  Can anyone comment or give an example of where WAV falls short of AIFF?  Any other arguments for WAV or AIFF?  Since they're both lossless, I'm not concerned about the sound quality differences if there even are any.  But the metadata question concerns me.  I'll mainly be using JRiver (or possibly Kodi) + USB DAC for music playing at home, and still want to use ipod for music on the go.

Thanks.
Logged

AndrewFG

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3392
Re: just starting out: rip to WAV and/or AIFF?
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2015, 06:50:55 pm »

I would say neither WAV nor AIFF. If you have any Apple devices then ALAC is the best. Otherwise FLAC.
Logged
Author of Whitebear Digital Media Renderer Analyser - http://www.whitebear.ch/dmra.htm
Author of Whitebear - http://www.whitebear.ch/mediaserver.htm

kstuart

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1955
  • Upgraded to MC22 Master using preorder discount
Re: just starting out: rip to WAV and/or AIFF?
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2015, 07:02:11 pm »

I would say neither WAV nor AIFF. If you have any Apple devices then ALAC is the best. Otherwise FLAC.
What he said.

jmone

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 14463
  • I won! I won!
Re: just starting out: rip to WAV and/or AIFF?
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2015, 07:12:56 pm »

I'd say rip to FLAC and let MC convert when syncing to Handheld, DLNA devices etc
Logged
JRiver CEO Elect

Matt

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 42373
  • Shoes gone again!
Re: just starting out: rip to WAV and/or AIFF?
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2015, 07:13:52 pm »

Here's a vote for APE because it's near and dear to my heart :P
Logged
Matt Ashland, JRiver Media Center

jtwrace

  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
  • "Science is not a democracy"-Earl Geddes, Ph.D.
Re: just starting out: rip to WAV and/or AIFF?
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2015, 07:18:02 pm »

A vote here for AIFF. 
Logged
W10 NUC i7 (Gen 10) > (Audiolense FIR) > Motu UltraLite mk5 > (4) Hypex NCore NC502MP > JBL M2 Master Reference +4 subs

My podcast:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXMw_bZWBMtRWNJQfTJ38kA/videos

JimH

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 72438
  • Where did I put my teeth?
Re: just starting out: rip to WAV and/or AIFF?
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2015, 08:06:06 pm »

Here's a vote for APE because it's near and dear to my heart :P
+ 100
Logged

jmone

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 14463
  • I won! I won!
Re: just starting out: rip to WAV and/or AIFF?
« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2015, 08:20:34 pm »

I wonder....

Matt Ashland
Logged
JRiver CEO Elect

Matt

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 42373
  • Shoes gone again!
Re: just starting out: rip to WAV and/or AIFF?
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2015, 08:34:25 pm »

Logged
Matt Ashland, JRiver Media Center

Hilton

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1291
Re: just starting out: rip to WAV and/or AIFF?
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2015, 10:08:29 pm »

Here's a vote for APE because it's near and dear to my heart :P

Yes we can tell... by the default conversion type in MC. :)

FLAC is generally supported in most devices with the exception of iDevices, and ALAC is well supported too now and the only choice for native playback in iDevices or iTunes for lossless audio.
I use FLAC but have been considering switching to ALAC.

I should point out that JRemote on the iPhone plays both FLAC and ALAC just fine streaming from JR MC20, but the native iPhone player doesn't support FLAC.
Also, if your streaming to AIRPLAY devices your best bet is still ALAC.

Good comparison "hear"... ;)
http://wiki.hydrogenaud.io/index.php?title=Lossless_comparison
Logged

6233638

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 5353
Re: just starting out: rip to WAV and/or AIFF?
« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2015, 10:23:59 pm »

AIFF is certainly a better option than WAV.
However I would recommend using losslessly compressed formats rather than uncompressed formats.
FLAC would be my recommendation, since it is the "standard" lossless compression scheme which most devices support. However ALAC would be better if you intend on using Apple mobile devices. (iPads/iPods/iPhones)
 
Any lossless or uncompressed format can be converted from one to the other with no loss of audio information, though some formats (e.g. WAV) lack a lot of metadata support. (such as embedded cover art)
All lossless or uncompressed formats sound the same, so your choice should really be based on device compatibility.
Logged

astromo

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 2251
Re: just starting out: rip to WAV and/or AIFF?
« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2015, 11:37:51 pm »

This one comes up regularly and the answers are generally the same from the same sources.

My suggestion is whichever compressed, lossless format you go for select playback from memory within MC. You can find assessments and opinions of how quickly different formats are converted during playback. As I understand it, that then becomes a non-issue if the track is already buffered into memory.

Search on Interact for more detail if you're interested.
Logged
MC33, Win10 x64, HD-Plex H5 Gen2 Case, HD-Plex 400W Hi-Fi DC-ATX / AC-DC PSU, Gigabyte Z370 ULTRA Gaming 2.0 MoBo, Intel Core i7 8700 CPU, 4x8GB GSkill DDR4 RAM, Schiit Modi Multibit DAC, Freya Pre, Nelson Pass Aleph J DIY Clone, Ascension Timberwolf 8893BSRTL Speakers, BJC 5T00UP cables, DVB-T Tuner HDHR5-4DT

6233638

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 5353
Re: just starting out: rip to WAV and/or AIFF?
« Reply #12 on: January 24, 2015, 12:14:25 am »

That happens whether Memory Playback is enabled or not.
Logged

JimH

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 72438
  • Where did I put my teeth?
Re: just starting out: rip to WAV and/or AIFF?
« Reply #13 on: January 24, 2015, 07:56:41 am »

My suggestion is whichever compressed, lossless format you go for select playback from memory within MC. You can find assessments and opinions of how quickly different formats are converted during playback. As I understand it, that then becomes a non-issue if the track is already buffered into memory.
Conversion requires little time.  Just a few seconds per track.  Memory playback would have no affect.

But that is off topic.
Logged

kstuart

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1955
  • Upgraded to MC22 Master using preorder discount
Re: just starting out: rip to WAV and/or AIFF?
« Reply #14 on: January 24, 2015, 01:48:06 pm »

Conversion requires little time.  Just a few seconds per track.  Memory playback would have no affect.

But that is off topic.
Double-blind studies have demonstrated that real-time conversion can have an effect - BUT - JRiver MC20's memory playback removes any possible effect of conversion.

So, with MC20 memory playback, there is absolutely no downside to using FLAC or ALAC.

For those who doggedly insist of uncompressed formats, FLAC now has an uncompressed setting, and then you still have all the tagging possibilities.
Pages: [1]   Go Up