Devices > JRiver Id -- Hardware by JRiver

NUC for ID - JRiver stock model or later version?

(1/3) > >>

Ferdi:
I start loving the idea of the Id. It was hard for me to understand the value proposition, since I never set up a media network, don't watch a lot of movies and never saw a need to stream music simultaneously in various rooms. Anyway, and despite the fact that I just bought some Sonos to understand their offering, I am now convinced that I want to stick with JRiver and move the server from PC to a dedicated HW.
Some questions remain.

Looking at Intel's web site, it is clear that ID's hardware is outdated and its specs are outmatched by all current models. That's where I would like to understand better the current Id offering and the decision to not upgrade to newer and more powerful HW. There might be great reasons and simply no need to upgrade?

- is the current model just simply good enough for a JRiver Server (what are the limits)?
- is it a compromise to keep costs down?
- is it because newer models consume more power?
- are newer models more noisy / require more cooling?
 
If the newer NUC models are better HW for a JRiver server - not just specs but in true performance - than buying one plus the new Id boot stick might be an alternate? Though Bob's comments on the video card requirements made me doubtful (would be great if his post would include the compatible NUC models, not chipset requirements. Man, there is so much research required with JRiver, thats were I really just love Sonos)
I'd appreciate insights from the experts on this forum :)

JimH:
If you're going to build your own using the Id Kit, the safest course would be to use the NUC 2820.

It installs Linux, the Id firmware, and MC.

Easier would be to purchase the Id already installed on a NUC we sell.

Ferdi:
Thanks, Jim.
I agree there is no point building my own using the 2820 - since you sell it ready to go.
I'd like to understand the limits of that version though, or reasons why the 2820 is the best option. It just seems odd these days to not buy current technology. As good as the price for the ID is, it's still money I want to make sure is well spent.

JimH:
I'm not sure what you mean by "current technology".  The 2820 has been very dependable and effective for the Id.

Ferdi:
Sorry, I don't want to create a wrong impression here. I have no doubts that 2820 works fine.

My question was: is there any specific reason why that model and not one with technology that is more powerful - and maybe newer -  than 2820? If so, what are the reasons that make the 2820 the most suitable?
2820 might have been the optimal choice when it came out, but maybe the later versions have features that in real life make the ID better

Since they are quite easy to build yourself - especially since you offer now the usb stick to boot it from - I think the question is reasonable given the various offerings of Intel.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page