INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: MC16 Benchmarks!  (Read 1831 times)

Jaguu

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1336
MC16 Benchmarks!
« on: October 02, 2011, 10:55:54 am »
I ran the MC16 benchmark tests on two of my 3 years old  pc's (main pc as library server, test pc with mc library client):

Theirs scores are: 
1. 1452/1540/2319/JRmark: 1771
2. 1497/1699/2309/JRmark: 1835

Now, what do those absolute values mean? Nothing without any kind of reference table that I can compare those values with. Unfortunately I did not find any such reference table anywhere!

The corresponding Windows performance indices are:
CPU: 6.5/6.5
RAM: 6.5/6.8
Graphic: 6.8/4.5
3D-Graphic: 6.8/5.3
HDD: 7.0/5.9

Although the first PC has a much better graphic card and an SDD disk, the second PC has more RAM (8GB vs. 4GB) and gives better overall JRmarks. So it seems that the amount of RAM is the key player in determine the JR marks results! Any comments?
Logged

DarkPenguin

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1921
Re: MC16 Benchmarks!
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2011, 11:26:21 am »
There is a thread where people posted theirs.  Do a search.

here is mine for a modern PC with iffy graphics (I'm not sure if my disk configuration makes a difference.  Everything is on a spinny disk but my OS is on an SSD.) ...

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
Score: 1933

Running 'Image' benchmark...
Score: 3519

Running 'Database' benchmark...
Score: 3144

JRMark (version 16.0.151): 2866

Windows experience numbers ...

Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz 7.5 6.3
  Determined by lowest subscore
 
Memory (RAM) 8.00 GB 7.8
Graphics Intel(R) HD Graphics Family 6.3
Gaming graphics 1760 MB Total available graphics memory 6.3
Primary hard disk 30GB Free (112GB Total) 7.6
Windows 7 Ultimate
Logged

JimH

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 72438
  • Where did I put my teeth?
Re: MC16 Benchmarks!
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2011, 11:26:36 am »
This is an over-simplification:
1000 Good
2000 Very Good
3000 Excellent
4000 Insane (Matt, for example)
Logged

Hendrik

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 10935
Re: MC16 Benchmarks!
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2011, 11:35:25 am »
4000 is possible? :p

My system is pretty fast, and i only get 3600.
i7-2600K (OC'ed to 4.4Ghz), NVIDIA GTX 570, 16gb of RAM, everything running on a SSD
Logged
~ nevcairiel
~ Author of LAV Filters

JimH

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 72438
  • Where did I put my teeth?
Re: MC16 Benchmarks!
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2011, 11:41:49 am »
Logged

Listener

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1084
Re: MC16 Benchmarks!
« Reply #5 on: October 02, 2011, 12:59:09 pm »
Quote from: Jaguu on October 02, 2011, 10:55:54 am
I ran the MC16 benchmark tests on two of my 3 years old  pc's (main pc as library server, test pc with mc library client):

...
 Any comments?

If you described your systems (CPU, amount of Ram, hard drive, graphics card), your results would be adding to the store of knowledge.

Bill
Logged

r_harms

  • Junior Woodchuck
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: MC16 Benchmarks!
« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2011, 01:51:26 pm »
I've Been tuning on my i7 2600k system lately...

It's running at 4.95 Ghz and sipping power, drawing only 66 watts from the wall at idle. It has 16GB CORSAIR Vengeance XMP Memory and it made a big difference when I set the ASUS P8Z68 Deluxe Bios to use XMP. It has a low end Nvidia 430 graphics card. I'm going to bump up my graphics card a couple notches with a new AMD/ATI 6670. I don't do any gaming so I want my power load will stay nice and low. I'm going with ATI because of the lack of 88.2 support over HDMI with Nvidia. The system has an OCZ Vertex 3 120G SSD Boot drive and 12 regular (Green) data drives totaling 20TB.

=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

Running 'Math' benchmark...
    Single-threaded integer math... 2.757 seconds
    Single-threaded floating point math... 1.821 seconds
    Multi-threaded integer math... 0.814 seconds
    Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.610 seconds
Score: 3165

Running 'Image' benchmark...
    Image creation / destruction... 0.572 seconds
    Flood filling... 0.295 seconds
    Direct copying... 0.581 seconds
    Small renders... 1.541 seconds
    Bilinear rendering... 0.800 seconds
    Bicubic rendering... 0.724 seconds
Score: 4875

Running 'Database' benchmark...
    Create database... 0.341 seconds
    Populate database... 0.848 seconds
    Save database... 0.113 seconds
    Reload database... 0.058 seconds
    Search database... 0.869 seconds
    Sort database... 0.708 seconds
    Group database... 0.669 seconds
Score: 5964

JRMark (version 16.0.179): 4668


My Windows Experience Numbers are

Processor 7.8
Memory 7.9
Graphics 6.7
Gaming Graphics 6.7
Disc 7.9

I LOVE the Sandybridge implementation, You can set aggressive power savings AND aggressive overclocking at the same time!

Truly the best of both worlds!

Rick
Logged

Jaguu

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1336
Re: MC16 Benchmarks!
« Reply #7 on: October 02, 2011, 02:06:17 pm »
PC1:
MB: Asus P5K Pro
CPU: Intel Core2 Duo E8400 3GHz: 6.5
RAM: 4GB: 6.5
Graphic: Nvidia GeForce 9000 GT: 6.8
Gaming graphics 2303 MB Total available graphics memory: 6.8
HDD: 128GB SSD for OS+Progs+Important Stuff, 500GB for Media: 7.0
Windows 7 x64 Pro
JRmark: 1771

PC2:
MB: Asus P5QL Pro
CPU: Intel Core2 Duo E8400 3GHz: 6.5
RAM: 8GB: 6.8
Graphic: Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS:4.5
Gaming graphics 4095 MB Total available graphics memory: 5.3
HDD: 2x500GB: 5.9
Windows 7 x64 Pro / Multiboot with various Windows Test-Servers (reason for 8GB RAM)
JRmark: 1835

I am planning to buy one of those Asrock Vision 3D to use as HTPC.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »