Because some people hear different frequencies differently. Well, all people really. So audio can be adjusted to match their hearing, or preference.
I have similar lines of questioning to Jim.
Why do you prefer the Onkyo?
Is it because you can select different effects like Concert Hall, Jazz Club, etc.? MC has that as well.
Is it because you have made adjustments to make the sound better from your seating position? MC has room correction.
Is it because you have made adjustments to certain frequency repsonses? MC has Equaliser (sliders) plus a Parametric Equaliser (filters).
Is it just because you are used to the Onkyo and how it works?
I'm not an expert in this area at all. My partner loves music and movies, but is deaf in one ear, so can't differentiate left/right/surround sound very well. For me, if it doesn't sound bad, then it must be fine. Though sometimes I do appreciate a particularly good piece of music or vocals. (I'm a terrible critic of the sound mixing used in all talent shows, like The X Factor currently showing. Why don't they turn up the volume on the singers microphone?! Half of them get totally drowned out by the music. How are we supposed to judge their singing if we can't hear it?! err. hmmm.)
I'm also still using a 1999 Sony Receiver, and so I'm forced to encode everything as Dolby Digital AC3, and send it via S/PDIF to the receiver for the best 5.1 sound possible. Therefore I do all sound processing in MC. That is one of the reasons I selected MC. It can do it all, and my receiver just needs to decode the audio and amplify it.
Back quite a few years ago now, when Bitstreaming was coming along and was the all new thing that everybody said was the best sound you can get, I thought I would upgrade all my audio equipment to models that supported Bitstreaming up to the DAC/Receiver. But I waited a while to see how it worked out, then I learned a bit more about it all. Then I waited. Then I got MC, and now I don't need Bitstreaming. When I upgrade my receiver, it may well be to much simpler receiver, that has very good DACs and Amplification sections, plus video pass through. I will just send multi-channel PCM via HDMI to the receiver to decode and amplify, plus pass video through to the TV. Or I may even use two HDMI outputs, one to the DAC+Amp/Receiver, and one directly to the TV, for an even simpler setup.
I don't know if turning off Bitstreaming would fix your Jump Media problem, but it may be worth a try. I don't generally get jumpy media, but do a little sometimes. However, I am only using an Intel HD4000 iGPU, which is far less powerful than your GTX 750 Ti, so I expect a lessor experience. When I do have issues with any media, I can usually put it down to the format in the media file, and hence what MC has to do to convert it to 1080p at 60Hz for the TV, particularly if the source file is interlaced recorded TV. I use WASAPI Exclusive Mode for audio.
Actually, for media files that are jumpy, how well do they play if you copy them over to your office PC and play them there? Are they okay then?
BTW, your Signature says you have an Onkyo TX-NR925, but your original post about it said it was an Onkyo TX-NR929.
http://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php?topic=83790.0I think it is an Onkyo TX-NR929, as I can't find an Onkyo TX-NR925. That is a nice piece of equipment, with a lot of features. But you don't need to use Bitstreaming to use those features. Sending PCM to it (Output encoding set to "None" in the DSP Studio) will still allow any features on the Onkyo to be used. Effectively by Bitstreaming you are just moving all decoding from MC to the Onkyo, and losing functionality in MC.
Caveat: If I am wrong in any of the above, will the audio experts please correct me. I don't mind being corrected.