Friends,
From Brian's letter, I concluded that I poorly described the switching of my equipment. I believe that it makes sense to discuss only one question - how connected are the iMac, on which the JRiver program is located, and Teac. Other components cannot interfere with data transfer. And I get all the problems, it seems to me, precisely because of incorrect data transfer settings. In my house, a MESH system is installed as a router, to which an external Internet is connected using fiber optics. One of the nodes (transmitters) of this MESH system communicates via Wi-Fi with my iMac. The Teac is connected to the optical fiber directly through the converter with a LAN wire. Thus, I am trying to set up the transfer of music files from my computer to Teac over the Internet. I suspect that it will be better if I connect the iMac to my internal network with a wire, then the problems of transmitting via Wi-Fi from the computer to the router will be eliminated. As I understand it, it is desirable that the data from the computer pass to the Teac via the internal Network without accessing the external Internet (an analogue of wire transfer via USB connecting two devices), but I myself will not be able to make such control settings. The original Teac control program allows me to configure the connection of an external NAS, the role of which in this case would be played by my iMac. But it is minimalistic in its ability to control via a tablet connected to the Teac via Wi-Fi, so I'm trying to use JRiver. Let's first make the necessary settings while the iMac is connected to the router via Wi-Fi, and after connecting by wire, it will be possible to make adjustments that you tell.
There is one more question, the answer to which I cannot give myself. Am I sacrificing sound quality when transmitting data over the Internet instead of a direct wired connection via USB? After all, the sound quality is a priority in my case. Maybe for the sake of high-quality sound it makes sense to return to the USB connection from a separate computer that only provides music, which will stand next to the Teac and forget about the described problems with transcoding and the difficulties of the Internet connection? The answer to compare the sound quality by ear is good, but I would like to deliberately eliminate all possible problem areas in the data transmission channel. Teac NT505 is not just a DAC, but an advanced network device, which, as the Japanese developer and manufacturer declares, should provide network transport of the highest quality music signal. Let's try to do that with JRiver.
Looking forward to your response and expert advice. It is especially valuable if someone has personal experience of switching Teac with a data source.
Best regards,
Veniamin