I'll be the whipping boy!
I agree. Take a look at how Macromedia sells their stuff. They break their product features down into three major categories of problem solving or audience. Then they work up a grid and stick to it.
And they spread their features out over 3 pages with nice, tight, clean, easy to use navigation with enough visual and textural interest to keep you going for more. This lets them use images that actually mean something even when small since they aren't trying to cram everything into one page. They also use bold first sentences if my memory serves to highlight the feature that will be discussed in 2-3 sentences.
Don't be afaid to zoom up and create a thumbnail that has a certain abstrct beauty that screams "click me to find out the whole story". Entire screen shots that are reduced to 1/2 the size of a postage stamp just aren't conveying any useful information and gives little incentive for clicking. Want to highlight album views? Put some in my face, take a look at iTunes, I see Beck, people!
I must say that I'm glad that you've gone with a font size that is legible.
Please don't skimp on the Web site, outside of a free version bundled with another's marketing machine, this is the most effective way to get the word out and for a lot of people, the only way they'll be convinced to download.
[Edit: Just read Jim's post made while writing this. I'm looking at it from the design standpoint, I wouldn't use an HTML program to write, but that's me. Obviously this is a work in progress, just hope the presentation progresses also, I've got the same issues with the current site]